my politics are the opposite of hers, but this is a stupid take, and an example of an entire class of stupid takes. "you protest gun laws but not cruelty to animals?" "you protest for the first amendment, but not for innocents locked up?" etc.https://twitter.com/w_terrence/status/1014654234682413056 …
-
0:33 -
Replying to @MorlockP
Is it entirely invalid? As used here it's basically a non sequitur to minimize the message of the protest. I can think of situations where you can validly critique "You are spending huge amounts of energy protesting problem A, while similar problem B is objectively more serious."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.