No, it's perfectly acceptable. Criminals should be separate from their children. That's because they're criminals. They are not some sort of special class of criminals. This is a scam designed to stop us from enforcing the laws are representatives passed. https://twitter.com/jameshasson20/status/1008515035549896705 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KurtSchlichter @MorlockP
Immigrants are not criminals. There is no victim, so there is no crime.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @russnelson @KurtSchlichter
I want immigration controls bc immigrants vote for bigger government, so do their kids, so do their grandkids. Allowing unchecked immigration (which Dems want) will turn us fully so socialist.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @KurtSchlichter
We have a secret ballot, you know..... How do you know how they vote?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @russnelson @KurtSchlichter
polling self-reporting correlation w immigration locations and election results question: if it could be proven to you that immigrants voted, say, 10% or 20% more for socialism than natives (far more than enough to elect socialists every time), would you support immigration ?
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @KurtSchlichter
Not into New Hampshire, I would not. The rest of the US is beyond hope. But why would a socialist immigrant even think about moving to NH?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @russnelson @KurtSchlichter
so you're saying that they can only land in, say, NY, and give the socialists there more seats in the house (even without being citizens they count for representation), or they can move to purple states and tip them blue ... and this won't affect federal tax rate or regulations?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @russnelson @KurtSchlichter
I presume you're saying that for the funzies, and not because you think that > 1% of NH residents WANT to succeed, nor bc you think that the chance of it working is > 0.001 % ?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @KurtSchlichter
As a negotiating position, it very much would "work". Maybe NH would never secede, but if we could get rid of those dratted checkpoints, that would be a start. Why would an immigrant who wants a bigger government move to NH, anyway? Why not move to NY which already has one?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
yes, they'd move to NY (or CA). And in doing so they give very blue NY / CA more reps. Who vote for more socialist federal policies that affect NH. Do you disagree w any of this?
-
-
Replying to @MorlockP @KurtSchlichter
No, but again, the way forward is NH independence.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @russnelson @KurtSchlichter
I'm all in favor of NH independence. Let's call that plan #1. IF that is 1% likely to succeed in the next 30 years, then the state of the USG is quite interesting to me, bc 99% likely, that's what I'm living under. May I also - in parallel - have opinions on how big USG grows?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.