This situation is pushing me in favor of a wall for 2 reasons. 1) A wall physically prevents them from bringing kids in, so no form of detention is needed. No cruelty allegations. 2) A wall, unlike a policy, won't get torn down and reshaped by the next administration/congress.
-
-
-
Basically we can either rely on heavy enforcement of a policy that is a bit cruel to kids and the baggage that drags with it, and risk said policy gets scrapped or unenforced... ...or just build a big wall (with big doors at legal entry points) and it enforces itself.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Michael-Scott-Bankruptcy.gif
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"What they say can be used against them." Wow, twinsies! Average Americans don't have Fourth and Fifth amendment protections anymore either! We're more alike than I ever knew.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
WTF is so damn hard for these asshats to understand about the necessity of protecting/policing a border known for heavy human trafficking?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.