That's nonsense. C'mon, dude.
-
-
Replying to @JimmyMcSavage
what is your evidence ? here's some of mine: http://www.nti.org/gsn/article/soviet-union-once-deployed-smallpox-tipped-icbms/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP
"in the 1960's", and they probably did engineering models and tests - he was in their bio program, that would be part of his job. You said 'we now know 2/3rds...' which is laughable. Back on your meds, dude.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JimmyMcSavage @MorlockP
Yeah, I don't see how you get to "2/3rds of their ICBM force" from that article either. A nuke is simpler and more effective than some weirdly contrived bio-dispersal device.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Gplavallee72 @JimmyMcSavage
I got it from the book by the Russian defector
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @JimmyMcSavage
Fair enough. Still think 2/3s is a vast overestimation of the deployment of those weapons.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Gplavallee72 @JimmyMcSavage
I have zero data that I've collected myself. All I have is info from the head of the Soviet Biopreparat. I'm willing to take him at his word, given the complete absence of any countervailing data.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MorlockP @JimmyMcSavage
Eh. Defectors had a tendency towards inflating the importance of themselves and their work to the "motherland."
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Gplavallee72 @JimmyMcSavage
yeah, agreed so what's your countervailing data?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MorlockP @JimmyMcSavage
Don't have any. You're the one making a leap here, not me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not making a leap. I'm citing data. You're telling me that my data is wrong. I'm wondering where you got YOUR data. Conventional wisdom? Older brother's Playboys? where?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.