In hindsight, it does NOT seem overblown...but it does seem slightly incorrect, because we now know that 2/3 of the Soviet ICBMs were tipped, not with nukes, but with weaponized anthrax, cholera, etc.https://twitter.com/asymmetricinfo/status/1001881927731867649 …
-
-
Don't have any. You're the one making a leap here, not me.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You have presented no 'data' that supports your post. One guy, who says 'we tried some things in the 60's', and you extrapolate that out to your "2/3rds" BS. FFS, take the L and more on.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The secrecy. Deterrents have no effect if the other side has no knowledge. Also, propaganda. Nuclear weapons were featured by both sides. Bio and chem, not as much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

