Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on June 1, 2020. Please switch to a supported browser, or disable the extension which masks your browser. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
MoralOfStory's profile
Moral Of Story
Moral Of Story
Moral Of Story
@MoralOfStory

Tweets

Moral Of Story

@MoralOfStory

HRM, THIS.

Joined November 2014

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Imprint
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Member Of Species‏ @MemberOfSpecies 24 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation

      2+2=4+1-1, so if you think 2+2=4, you should feel bad for both overestimating and underestimating the value of 2+2 by 1.

      3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    2. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 25 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @MemberOfSpecies

      Well actually, the preschool question of "2 + 2 = ?" is a question of reduction, not equality. The symbol = has two meanings. It is only later that it gains the meaning of the reflexive symmetric closure of the first meaning (it's already transitive).

      1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
    3. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 25 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ReferentOfSelf @MemberOfSpecies

      2 + 2 = 4 + 1 - 1 is incorrect because the right side is not a value, but an unreduced term of type Nat.

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    4. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 25 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ReferentOfSelf @MemberOfSpecies

      Incidentally, ignoring this distinction is what makes torture vs dust specks a fake thought experiment

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
    5. Content of Media‏ @ContentOfMedia 25 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ReferentOfSelf @MemberOfSpecies

      Because it reduces (sums) the dust specks and compares them against a single torture value? Or am I misunderstanding?

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 26 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ContentOfMedia @MemberOfSpecies

      Reading back on this, I didn't straightforwardly answer your question. 3^^^3 is a mathematical construct, it is a tree which you can act on with certain algorithms. Those algorithms turn 2 + 2 into 4 and 3^^3 into 7625597484987...

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    7. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 26 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ReferentOfSelf @ContentOfMedia @MemberOfSpecies

      This is distinguished from a quantity - something which can be the count of some collection of things in the world. 3^^^3 is a term of type Nat (a certain sort of tree). It doesn't correspond to any quantity.

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. Moral Of Story‏ @MoralOfStory 26 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ReferentOfSelf @ContentOfMedia @MemberOfSpecies

      Solution there, seems to me, is to get a bigger world.

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    9. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 26 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @MoralOfStory @ContentOfMedia @MemberOfSpecies

      Just being in a bigger world doesn't give your mind a larger capacity and bandwidth and lifespan

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
      Moral Of Story‏ @MoralOfStory 26 Feb 2018
      • Report Tweet
      • Report NetzDG Violation
      Replying to @ReferentOfSelf @ContentOfMedia @MemberOfSpecies

      When you say some Nat doesn't correspond to a quantity, do you claim that due to the small size of the universe or the small size of our brains? Are you an ultrafinitist?

      9:33 PM - 26 Feb 2018
      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 27 Feb 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @MoralOfStory @ContentOfMedia @MemberOfSpecies

          Small size of our brains, though it is also too large for any being which can exist in the universe. We are finite, in a sense I'm an ultrafinitist, but it is at a level deep into the interpretation of the math, not the math itself. The reals in classical logic are still useful.

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Referent Of Self‏ @ReferentOfSelf 27 Feb 2018
          • Report Tweet
          • Report NetzDG Violation
          Replying to @ReferentOfSelf @MoralOfStory and

          Any "resolution" which claims to make 3^^^3 sensible is only making a model of 3^^^3 sensible to a model of some agent in a model of the universe. It cannot be made sensible by the real actual us in the real actual universe.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. End of conversation

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Imprint
        • Cookies
        • Ads info