@The_Lagrangian @FrameOfStack I think it just assumes outside judge. Individual copies of you by definition can't observe diffs in the sims.
-
-
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory@FrameOfStack well, sort of. after the bet is resolved you now have evidence of being in sim2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@MoralOfStory@FrameOfStack the fact that you *can* have a memory of evidence of being in a sim but *don't* is evidence against3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian@FrameOfStack Since the simulators won't help us, maybe best we can do is survey the computational universe for our copies..1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory@FrameOfStack prob is that surveying for copies is dependent on model of how potential simulators behave1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian@FrameOfStack Survey ever larger parts of comp. universe. **Does the limit converge??** simulator behavior doesn't matter(?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory@FrameOfStack skeptical that would be true as the only things to sim you in high enough fidelity that there are *no* diffs...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@MoralOfStory@FrameOfStack ...would be things causally tied to you somehow (future humans, em employers, etc)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @The_Lagrangian
@The_Lagrangian@FrameOfStack no, definitely not. Depends on how discoverable your program is.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory@FrameOfStack I am confused why there should be things making sims of me for no reason1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@The_Lagrangian @FrameOfStack Any process that runs all computer programs runs an arbitrarily large number of copies of you.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.