For any system with Physics + external free will, we can present a new Physics which includes the rules for each.
-
-
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory I sort of disagree. If the simplest description of a system has two components, why not label them as two components?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ObjectOfObjects
@ObjectOfObjects this is more a disproof of the position "free will can't possibly be part of physics" than statement about physics1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory How about "Deep Blue can't possibly be part of Chess"?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @ObjectOfObjects
@ObjectOfObjects "Deep blue can't possibly be part of <class of things which chess is one possible member>"
12:40 AM - 10 Apr 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.