PSA: the is-ought problem only holds if you are a dualist, otherwise ought is determined as a function of physical systems and therefore IS.
@CorrectionOfSic @The_Lagrangian You're arguing that the oughts live in human minds. I happen to agree, but I think philosophers may not.
-
-
@MoralOfStory fair enough. I think that putting it outside humans is silly. Moral facts only apply to things that exist, no humans no morals -
@CorrectionOfSic I would expand that to social agents w/ some individudal goals, some shared goals -> morals, because game theory
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.