It's almost like people have no idea what it feels like to be on the other side.
-
-
Replying to @MoralOfStory
Like an organization that solved world hunger 95% of the time and tortured old ladies the other 5% is probably a tough sell to most people.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
So why do lefties keep telling us that 99.9999% of PP is not abortions? That argument carries no weight to the deontological-murder believer
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
Admittedly "you are wrong about morality" is a harder sell, but it's much more honest.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory Also, money is fungible. Funds that pay for feeding the hungry free up resources to torture old ladies.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@DeityOfReligion That's just an argument to let people starve though--competing methods of food delivery allow the org to do more torture.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory If org has separate accounts for objectives A and B, donating to the A account won't help them do B more.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@MoralOfStory But if org pools their resources, any donation helps achieve both A and B, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DeityOfReligion
@DeityOfReligion and anything that causes more A means org can focus more on B.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@DeityOfReligion but earmarking is ineffective for non-extreme values, yes.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.