@ContentOfMedia This doesn't follow. morality of X independent question from whether perpetrator of X can do moral reasoning.
-
-
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory Excellent! Do you consider predation (say wolves eating rabbits) immoral?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia It's low on list of things to fix, but ideally, make version of rabbits w/out sensation, and sepr8 wolves from real rabbits.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory This seems like an excessively gods-eye view of morality.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@MoralOfStory I's like a morality that helps tell me what to do tomorrow.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia work on anti-aging & xrisk reduction. Fixing rabbit/wolf interactions can wait.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory So, that's a legitimate position, but...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@MoralOfStory It rounds off to "everything is immoral", which, okay, but I'm not going to get worked up about it then.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia morality not binary; fix worst problems first.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory But the "worst problems" are so big, and so technical that the best I can do is earn-to-give.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ContentOfMedia also probably available: spread awareness. I guess individuals can prioritize by (badness * probability of reducing badness)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.