The naturalist narrowing of morality: 1. All creatures act as they have evolved to do. 2. Most creatures have no moral qualms.
-
-
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
3. Only humans have moral qualms. 4. Humans are the only actors that care about morality.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
5. In a world without humans, creatures would kill each other without moral qualms.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
6. The death of a non-human is not a morally culpable event.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia This doesn't follow. morality of X independent question from whether perpetrator of X can do moral reasoning.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory Excellent! Do you consider predation (say wolves eating rabbits) immoral?2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia It's low on list of things to fix, but ideally, make version of rabbits w/out sensation, and sepr8 wolves from real rabbits.1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MoralOfStory
@MoralOfStory This seems like an excessively gods-eye view of morality.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@ContentOfMedia hey that role is currently unfilled or badly filled. @DeityOfReligion what is up with that anyway?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.