We live in a Big World. Or even if we don't, the Big World is out there and many copies of us live in it.
6/ Of course, that's computationally infeasible, even if the Big World wasn't infinite.
-
-
7/ So better think about the final distribution of the Big World. Might only need to think about branches w/ infinite computation available,
-
8/ since they'll dominate ones with only finite computation, like ours, depending on the relative frequency of the two types of branches.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@MoralOfStory Nature's cruelest tyranny is our inability to change our preferences at whim, to only care about the nice futures. -
@FrameOfStack I'd much rather have the ability to change other people's preferences. (Actually not really, too evil for my taste.) - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@MoralOfStory Infinite is a very big word.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.