New video time!
HOW TO WIN AN ARGUMENT BY CHANGING AN INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
What started out as a petty and stubborn attempt to win an argument might end up changing the entire autonomous vehicle industry...
👉🏼 youtu.be/CN7q3ZC1cbU
Conversation
Show replies
Replying to
Another solution would be to move the "legal and business" ODD limits to L4. So L5 would have no ODD limits other than country. L4 would have all the other limits (tech, legal or business). That would make the definitions more consistent, I think.
1
Replying to
Level 5 already has a limit of "in that region of the world" anyway (just didn't get into it because there were too many caveats).
1
1
Show replies
Replying to
In high school I drove an old 80s minivan with a cruise control that just locked the accelerator in place. That's level 0. But any cruise control with a PID controller is definitely level 1.
1
2
Replying to
Yeah, brick on the accelerator is level 0 imo too. But that's less of cruise control and more of a throttle lock.
Replying to
Fun story from 's research: in the 1920s, AT&T learned that people were using coin-sized plumbing washers to defraud its payphones. Instead of improving the coin box design, they built up their influence on the standards committees and changed the washer size.
1
1
Replying to
Without a L5 (which needs redefining), how does one describe an AV that is intended to operate in all feasible driving scenarios, including resuming when possible?
1
Replying to
If it is intended to operate in all feasible driving scenarios, but also resumes, then what is it resuming from?
1
Show replies