yess i think the estimation for m4a was 34 trillion over the next decade
-
-
-
I’ve heard low estimates of 15T and higher estimates of 40T. our government will put ~36T+ into healthcare over the decade. along with the income tax, it will be much cheaper, even with the high estimate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I find it amusing that Republicans and certain establishment democrats find med4all "too expensive". Yet the cost of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan didn't bother them at all.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So if we gut our over-bloated and curiously irresponsible military budget...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Per year?
-
Over 10 years.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
M4A was the cheapest option available during the primary, it also provided the most benefits and best outcomes. This isn't hard to believe with a cursory examination of every country which runs a modern healthcare system (which includes many countries not in the OECD).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’ve used the NHS multiple times in my stay over here in the UK. It works. It’s wonderful. The most I’ve paid for is cab fare. America deserves our own NHS.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not to mention 53% discretionary spending is straight to defense. “How do we pay for it?!” can always swiftly be answered with the slightest inspection of our priorities.
-
Healthcare being in mandatory spending, one could imagine all the ways discretionary spending could go towards community services, sustainable infrastructure, clean energy, sanitation, public transit. You know, for good public health, that make medical care less costly overall?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
