I don’t have any grand solutions to implement but I have advocated for a jury-based moderation system like Periscope. Not perfect but the more people you add, the more consideration would be given to context. Probably wouldn’t have as many harmless tweets caught up in the mess.
-
-
Vis denne trådTak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
Selective Moderation
-
True. Should’ve added this as an option.
Afslutning af samtale
Ny samtale -
-
-
Twitter needs to respect the idea that it is a platform, not a thinktank for them to police.
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
Under moderation you can fix yourself by blocking and muting people you dont like. Over moderation is forcing you to see only what twitter likes.
- 1 svar mere
Ny samtale -
-
-
Over, it's better to let people type and show just how stupid they can be.
-
That way the thought police can find them later on and put them into camps or something.
Afslutning af samtale
Ny samtale -
-
-
Twitter has both a block and a mute function. Both of these are the actual solution to online harassment. Everything beyond that is just censorship, plain and simple. Twitter isn't a schoolteacher, and they need to stop trying to be.
- 1 svar mere
Ny samtale -
-
-
Moderating a "platform" is a paradoxon in and of itself It isn't a platform anymore if certain stuff is prohibited or blocked off. It isn't a marketplace of ideas if certain ideas are deleted from it. It is more like an editorial board with public access
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
More transparency in moderation, all moderation should be public and justly explained is not a matter of over or under moderation. Also no exception for anybody, no matter who they are.
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
Tough to choose, but I'd rather that Twitter spend less time censoring people for having a political opinion and more time cleaning up the bots.
- 1 svar mere
Ny samtale -
-
-
Policing language never ends well. Warnings like 1984 or Germany’s past always get ignored or worse, copied by todays “thought leaders”.
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
Algorithm moderation.
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
Why should there be any? I think we need to return to first principles and ask why should there be moderation?
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
You can always block there is no need for Twitter police the mute/block/ unfollow is perfectly sufficient
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
Unfair and imbalanced rule enforcement. No due process for the accused.
Tak. Twitter bruger dette til at forbedre din tidslinje. FortrydFortryd
-
-
-
People can already moderate what they personally see. Except for those who are actively inciting violence the platform should stay out of it.
-
Even "inciting violence" should not be the watchword for Twitter. Example, "We must bomb (North Korea)(Iran)(Saudi Arabia)(place favorite here)" Incitement to violence, of course, but a valid realpolitik position as well.
Afslutning af samtale
Ny samtale -
Indlæsning ser ud til at tage noget tid.
Twitter kan være overbelastet eller have en midlertidig forstyrrelse. Prøv igen, eller se flere oplysninger på Twitter Status.



• formerly Chicago, currently East coast •