Time for a new addition to our list of 1,001 Private Company Financial Statements You Must Read Before You Die...: Kissinger Associates, which may be the most profitable consulting company on earth on a per-employee basis. Isaacson's biography places Kissinger's personal...
-
Show this thread
-
...income at $8 million in 1988 dollars, and that was just six years after he founded the company. We can only fantasy-tweet about what he must make now...Kissinger Associates also exemplifies one of the most important, yet intangible factors associated with successful...
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
...middlemen businesses: Their role as intermediaries of trust between two sides of a transaction who don't know/trust each other, often to the point of feeling they work for both sides even if they only get paid by one. More on middlemen here: http://www.privateinvestmentbrief.com/blog/the-mystery-of-the-middleman/ …
1 reply 1 retweet 6 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @ThePIBnyc
Nice piece on Mr. Karamazan. This is kind of a trivial point, because it's weirdly obvious, but it's also right: They exist because they provide value. If they didn't, they wouldn't exist. I say this as a middleman.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @ThePIBnyc
With respect, there is nothing obvious or trivial about your assertion. There is no shortage of examples of economic agents that provide no economic value whatever (or represent negative value-added, in fact).
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LIBORsquared @ThePIBnyc
With respect, can you give me 3 examples of agents that provide no (or negative) economic value?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @ThePIBnyc
Kissinger Associates, Tony Blair Associates, Prime Policy Group, etc
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LIBORsquared @ThePIBnyc
They provide value in two ways: 1. Everyone knows Kissing & Blair and they can make introductions to gov'ts to which you can sell stuff 2. I wouldn't be surprised if they engaged in corrupt activities i.e. you're in shit with some foreign gov't, Kissinger knows a guy.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @ThePIBnyc
Take your point 2, for example. When I refer to economic value-added, I'm speaking in aggregate terms, i.e. net of externalities. Corruption is an externality.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
If you look at it in aggregate, sure, there are middlemen that provide negative value, but that's not core to the question. The question is "why do they exist" - and the answer is "because they provide value to others" (not in aggregate) who see that their existence continues.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.