But then wouldn't we end up with a bunch of "no" papers, not knowing what to do withave them? As long as replication studies are disincentivized things wonthe improve.
Cool idea. The peers in peer-reviewed papers should sign off on the papers in this way.https://twitter.com/ESYudkowsky/status/932818755154886656 …
-
-
-
I'm not so sure about that. As I understand it, this change encourages authors to do their own replication or at least rigorously confirm their ideas. It disincentivizes the publication of crap, while still letting through powerful new results.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.