I saw this and wanted to break it down into component parts because I don't think it's totally right:
I agree with that. However, I don't think he's a pseudoscientist because he doesn't think he's a scientist. He's more of a philosopher.
-
-
He is error prone, but what he gets right is way more abundant and what he gets right is unique which is really significant. Contrarian &
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Pseudophilosopher too then
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.