So, I guess you could say "Undiscovered ideas."
-
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I think it can be useful as long as you keep the investment (time mostly, not money) low.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gsvigruha
Obscure does not necessarily mean bad, it could have stayed that way for many reasons (bad implementation, ahead of its time, randomness).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gsvigruha
I need to work out how to find obscure but good books - not so easy!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @gsvigruha
Judge them by their covers probably
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I just thought of sg, domain matters. In physics new discoveries depend on latest tech, in human/social domain not so much (old can work)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gsvigruha
sg? Perhaps in physics, but not in invention or engineering field. Old stuff can work wonders there. Discovery of oil for example.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
something. It's probabilistic, in engineering there is a higher chance X could not have been discovered in principle before
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gsvigruha
Ah got it. The harder it is to prove something, the more likely it is to be forgotten/lost it seems.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Yes, + harder as in depends on previously nonexistent stuff (oil could have been and were discovered in middle ages but not nanotech)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.