Just because you’re a practitioner doesn’t mean your perception is correct. It’s just correct for your own experience. A non-practitioner can arguably be more objective.
True/False: Autobiographies are the perfect balance of - Instructive - Enjoyable - Memorable - Tested* *When you read a non-practitioner's account of a topic, it's hard to know if you're reading their incorrect perception of it, as opposed to a true depiction.
-
-
-
Mostly disagree with that. Anyone who’s been a practitioner in a field over a long period where people who fail exit the sample (I.e. not union job protected teachers) is a very trustworthy source on that field.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.