It's en vogue for society to not tell women this, or to tell women that they don't need to worry about this at all and that they can have kids whenever, just like Kim Kardashian, using frozen egg surrogates. That's bullshit.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Really? Wow, I thought ~33 would be easy.
-
35 is considered a geriatric pregnancy
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Men aren’t helping the matter either! Our sperm counts have been going down for years.https://www.theatlantic.com/family/archive/2018/10/sperm-counts-continue-to-fall/572794/ …
-
True! From my research though that is likely to be your limiting factor.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
33 is nowhere near too old. Sounds like a lot of performance anxiety to me. We had ours when I was 32 and my wife was 31. The 16 months later we had our second child. But I do agree that waiting too long or for life to be perfect is not the best choice!
-
It’s not only a binary outcome. Babies from older mothers are more at risk of having birth defects. Personally, that’s what concerns me the most.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
As you age, your reproductive capacity drastically decreases
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.