Molson Hart

And some of the more open to self-criticism/self-observation/feedback tend to be Right of Centre White folks. (Somewhat religious, somewhat pro-capitalist, etc.,) The more the display of pronouns, higher the privilege exhibited/expected Vs Non-Whites/other countries' peoples.

Complex issues. If you’re right I shouldn’t respond

Oh please do. Response is different from umbrage. (And as it gets more complex, Twitter gets less handy with responses)

Okay. My feeling is that white people on racism fall into the following categories: 1) they don’t care about the topic. It is not relevant to them 2) virtue signallers 3) true racists 4) scientific justifiers 5) people who don’t discuss it publicly 6) honest anti racist zealots

In most foreign countries, people are just group 1. In the USA the population breakdown is something like: 1>5>2>4>6>3

Sure. What I'm pointing out is that in-group folks find it hard to see. If not impossible. The first 3 tweets of this thread, apply not just to policing but entire historical/current narrative. Look at News Pictures of the rioting.https://twitter.com/greatbong/status/1267253296986652672?s=19 …

I don’t know what in our group means but I can tell you that I’ve dealt with many nasty cops and many cops are not white. It’s also tough for me to sympathize with members of the highest earning ethnic group in the United States when they are complaining.

In-group. Out-group. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/In-group_and_out-group …. Self-identification. Etc., (We're all in-group and out-group in different contexts)