Molson Hart

Both threads seemed kind of obvious to me. Maybe I need to sit down and think of what I wouldn't consider obvious and make a thread.

I would love to hear it.

"not everyone should be an entrepreneur" and "good entrepreneurs try to reduce risk" are both so obvious to me that I wouldn't have bothered mentioning them. Although perhaps it's not obvious to others. 1/X

One thing that's less obvious is how reasonable goals change with the universe you're in. In this universe, it's practical for X% of people to become entrepreneurs. That number is far less for a peasant 4 centuries ago, and depends on many factors 2/X

Some of those factors: availability of capital, cost of capital, realistic odds of success, career options. 99% of the people who "would become a founder no matter what" would be better off with a corporate job paying 5M/year in the counterfactual world where they could get it

FAANG pays something like 300k/year to talent. The decision to found a company has a higher bar than the world where they paid 100k, which was like 10 years ago? (All salary info is anecdotal, I believe @danluu had some of this data?) 4/X

Many founders run businesses that should not exist because they lose money. As a rule of thumb, if you can't convince VC to fund you *and* you can't turn a profit, your startup should not exist. I don't think there are very many counterexamples. 5/X

Should probably say if you can't convince *anyone* to fund you. I talked to someone who spent 2 years building software before realizing nobody would pay for it, even though they had free users who allegedly loved it. 6/X