@mlipsitch wouldn't we have observed higher serology estimates most places by now if the Los Alamos doubling times (even given slowed transmission post intervention) were accurate, given when community transmission began?
-
-
r0 of 5.7 seems high but is believable. 1. Spain population 47 million 2. Serological prevalence 5% 3. 2.35 million infections so far. 4. r0 estimate = 5.7 5. 5.7^x = 2,350,000, x = # cycles = 8.4 6. Assume 2 week cycle 7. 8.4 * 2 weeks = 17 weeks = 4 monthspic.twitter.com/SMjq9AIRwE
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @toad_spotted and
A 2 week cycle seems high. In the Skagit County cluster, people who got sick had symptoms within five days and most were at 3 days post exposure:https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6919e6.htm#T1_down …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
In that case, the 5.7 r0 is totally believable and may be a bit low, before controlling for increased mask usage.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.