Amazon beat brick and mortar retail, but it was not a fair fight. Here's how they did it: 1. They didn't charge sales tax while brick and mortar retail did. Amazon argued that they were not the responsible party for the collection of sales tax. Stupid government, perhaps,
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I agree with what you said but you’re missing the point. Convenience. Convenience. Convenience. Traditional retail is/was no competition for Amazon, mostly because of how convenient Amazon is.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MWMW_007
I'm not missing the point man. What I'm saying is that there is MORE to it than convenience.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I agree with you on that man. All I’m saying is “small” brick & mortar retail was always going to struggle to compete with Amazon. Largely a function of scale b/c Amazon initially targeted a lot of niche product areas, which were primarily serviced by small businesses.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MWMW_007 @Molson_Hart
You mix scale advantages, some of which are passed onto the consumer with convenience and there’s no competition. Amazon wins every-time.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I know you do. I have followed you for a while. I’m suggesting that scale advantages and convenience are the most important reasons for Amazon’s dominance. Price is how they draw you in, but convenience is how they keep you around.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MWMW_007 @Molson_Hart
Amazon isn’t always cheaper for all items. It’s only cheaper for a few items, but once you try it out and order from Amazon, the convenience keeps you going back. Even when it’s more expensive!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.