Yep (ThAnKs ObAmA/GoOgLe). The IPR process of the AIA was implemented in a way that basically meant any patent worth asserting could be ~95% chance be invalidated for roughly $300k In USPTO & legal fees. Mayo/Alice SCt decisions threw a cloud of uncertainty over most patents.
Ok, just read the article. He's not paying the $17 million in legal bills. Zuru is. There's no way he could be paying that much off of royalties.
-
-
His relationship with his attorneys, contractors, manufacturers is his business. Separately, the US patent system has declined. Both issues likely played a role in how the parties came to terms; but, so what? The first to invent should get the right of exclusion!
-
Returning to my original point - his story isn't evidence that the system isn't working. Zuru was selling $100M/year - whatever marginal additional sales they might have had in a counterfactual world clearly wouldn't change the incentives significantly.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.