Let’s talk about Sweden and the coronavirus. While it’s easy to find pictures of galavanting Swedes (publication bias) it’s hard to get real data that gives a sense of what’s happening on the ground there. Happy to be corrected, but it looks like a fairly tough lockdown.
-
Show this thread
-
Sweden’s no lockdown lockdown: - sporting events cancelled - no gatherings over 50 - restaurants and bars open but have been closed for not following social distancing measures - restrictions in public transport (empty seats next to you on train)pic.twitter.com/MAIWCTLzx0
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
Daily “Trips” compared to week of feb 3 to feb 9 are down about 13%. Given that Sweden is likely lightless and miserable in early February I suspect that the year over year data is much much worse (from http://local.se article)pic.twitter.com/saRN7OyCSn
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
Their economy is also, just like everyone else’s, fucked. Yeah it doesn’t help that everyone around them has a strict lockdown (more strict?) but still. They’ve had to do bailouts like the rest of us. Further, while the infection and death data has been pretty muted, it still
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
does not look sustainable. I don’t know how fast people are recovering and how much warmer weather and sunlight does to this bug but yeah...this to me does not look good. We all know deaths are on a time lag so when the young people go out they come home and kill their relatives.pic.twitter.com/Ev6wkcBXzv
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
~40% of Stockholm has/had SARS2. Death count is lagged in two ways. Reported
#s come in late and some current cases will die. So perhaps the real number is 5k deaths. By the time this is over that might be 10-15k deaths? This isn't what people thought SARS2 was mid-march.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orrdavid @Molson_Hart
Sweden can pretty much go back to normal in a month with their strategy. That isn't economic calamity. Most cities don't need to change anything or have anything closed with this new info.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orrdavid
First I think 40% is way too high. All these serological tests have sampling error problems and Sweden, with its sensitive groups being shut in would be particularly bad. Also, given how many deaths we have seen, 40% is unrealistic. Lastly, even if it is 40%, your remaining 60%
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
Is the most vulnerable because it’s all old and sick people. I’m standing by the “Sweden, overhyped solution” thesis.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Molson Hart Retweeted Derek Thompson
Some apparent supporting data. The guys description of it is a bit misleading when you look at the graph however.https://twitter.com/dkthomp/status/1256961177290182656?s=21 …https://twitter.com/DKThomp/status/1256961177290182656 …
Molson Hart added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.