Molson Hart

There's a pretty strong normative argument for regulating ISPs like other utilities, isn't there? And people do in fact complain all the time about the injustice of their cable bills; they're just helpless to do anything about it.

sorry you missed my point, i meant if you dont like consumer facing demand aggregators being able to establish quasi monopolies than you need to end the internet because that's the way it is

I didn’t miss it...I just don’t see the logic of why the ease of aggregating demand on the internet grants businesses unquestionable pricing power? Given that the internet tends toward monopolies doesn’t that validate the concerns of the dispersed customer/suppliers?

Sure if we start with Google and work our way down, it's an interesting conversation to have. But its a total rethink of the entire digital world, which you may be in favor of. Under current constructs, food delivery apps are no more nefarious than any other consumer marketplace.

You didn't have to buy oil from Standard Oil either. You could simply drive a truck to Western Pennsylvania, pay a landowner to dig your own hole, fill the truck, and drive back. Easy!

I don't know enough about the restaurant delivery business to have a strong opinion but I do know enough about e-commerce to know this is wrong. "Acquiring other customers like any other business" means paying ransom prices to Facebook, Google, etc.https://twitter.com/modestproposal1/status/1257317553661022211 …

It's interesting. If an e-commerce company wants to acquire customers they need to pay: 1. Facebook 2. Google 3. Amazon (4. Or now Walmart) Pick your poison. This feels unfair, but is it? If you want to ship a package you need to pay: A. FedEx B. UPS C. USPS (D. Or now Amazon)

I'm not totally sure why but 1234 definitely feels less competitive than ABCD. Some reasons why: 1. USPS doesn't squeeze its customer 2. For a heavy cross country package I have 2 options. For a midweight package I have 3. I for a lightweight I have 1 but USPS doesn't gouge.