Thing I’ve been contemplating today about business: “The game you choose to play matters more than how good you are at it.” Not a 100% sold on that being a truism, but can’t find any counterexamples.
-
-
Replying to @mgirdley
Agree with you, but can think of some sort of counterexamples. Walton, Bezos, etc. Very tough game, but a big game, so they had an outsized outcome when they succeeded.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Yeah, for sure. Both retailers interestingly. In their cases, played to the idea that economies of scale in retail are probably more impactful than any other industry. Though Bezos has real 2nd/3rd acts (ex AWS) where Walton didn’t.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mgirdley
Walton, as amazing as he was, is not as good as Bezos, who is otherworldly.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @mgirdley
I might be able to come up with a few more for you: - joe jamail - Tillman fertitta - armancio ortega, tadashi yanai Bill gates was hitting 1 billion at least no matter the field. Buffett too.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Ah this is good. Looking up Jamail and Yanai, I’d argue those guys picked good games to play. Yanai in particular is totally blue ocean strategy. Arguably, so did Bezos and Walton, too. Another one is Guy Laliberte (Cirque de Soleil).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mgirdley @Molson_Hart
So maybe I think saying: The game of “retail” is bad and a red ocean. But Wal-Mart playing the “discount retailer game focused on small town America” is a GREAT game — a blue ocean.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mgirdley
For sure agree. No one can be successful without going blue ocean right, at least blue pond (niche)? Walton is super interesting. He was a copycat who everyone ignored until it was tooooo late.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Yeah — so the “game” you choose needs to be one that you play in a blue ocean, methinks.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, but there are some blue oceans that can support many sharks, like PE in the 80s, hedge funds in the 90s. Cirque du Soleil is the opposite. There can really only be 1, maybe 2 of those. To me, that relates back to what you said: game choice is huge.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.