If the evidence was there, why would they need an agreement?
If this were true, we wouldn't need 17 agencies. We'd just need the evidence. I see this as a very bad sign. It's not good when the media machine starts chanting "China bad" like they have for Russia over the past 4 years.https://twitter.com/johnrobertsFox/status/1256576858923073539 …
-
-
-
Also true. Just don't extend this to global warming haha.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
With the understanding that we may never have “smoking gun evidence” consensus is the best we may get. “Unofficial releases” is another story though.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The media machines were 30 years too late. 31 to be exact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.