I used to really dig following this guy. I read a lot of his blogposts and was awed by a lot of what I read, much of which I didn’t understand. Then I read this. It’s all wrong. And instead of admitting that, he just engaged in hand-waving. I don’t pretend to be a successfulhttps://twitter.com/LT3000Lyall/status/1240139848125734912 …
It’s the way you used EPS.
If you just look at market cap/earnings, then buybacks and dividends give the same CAPE result.
With that said @svrnco sent me some paper where shiller said corporate payout policy affects cape so I have to read that before being confident.
-
-
I don't really follow your argument (3). CAPE is calculated as price/10y trailing earnings, so if EPS is increasing over time while P/E remains constant, then CAPE will be inflated. Only way this doesn't apply is if you're arguing that P/E will change in response to buybacks.
-
I don’t know what 3 is a reference to but my original tweets are clear. What you wrote doesn’t make sense to me. Think of it this way. Cape has a bunch of variables in its calculation: earnings, price, time, inflation. You’re saying EPS is changing. Why? Because # of shares is.
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.