2) It is not actually the pandemic that is causing airlines to stop revenue, but government. “Free markets” does not mean letting airlines fail. It means not preventing travel to begin with. I think this makes a lot of sense, however I don’t think gov’t bailouts are necessarily
-
-
Show this thread
-
the proper solution. We have a legal system. Perhaps it would have been better if we had let airlines sue the government for compensation after the fact. 3) Creation of moral hazard. I worry a lot about how people will act if the bailout is successful. With it, government is
Show this thread -
saying: no matter what’s around the bend we will print money until it’s fixed. That doesn’t seem long-term healthy. Yes, it’s good to avoid disruption but at what long term cost to our system?
Show this thread -
Strong counterpoint to theory 2. https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1250740323120230405?s=21 …https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1250740323120230405 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But we know the pandemic was
#CompletelyForeseeable. Only the specific timing was in doubt. https://www.cnn.com/2017/04/03/health/gallery/seven-reasons-global-pandemic-risk-virus-bacteria/index.html … Yet governments and companies disregarded this risk, as it required some moderate preparation. -
If you were a mom and pop small business and had a year to prepare I still think it would’ve been impossible though right? So perhaps a better way to phrase would be: foreseeable but insoluble should it occur for many
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.