At first the thesis was to flatten the curve, which I agreed with. Hammering down our economy every 2 months to try containment is not that. In the last 3 weeks 15 million people were put out of work. That will keep going up. This kills far more people than the virus, imo.
-
-
Replying to @orrdavid
After the first lockdown they don’t have to be national if you test competently.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I was a lot more optimistic about that until Singapore had to lock down again; they couldn't figure out where new cases were coming from. Similarly Japan isn't controlling this either, though they're very dense. I think people will realize containment isn't an option soon.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @orrdavid
Singapore afaict was not be strict enough with testing. They were just doing contact tracing well. I think my pinned tweet is not that bad for the economy. The problem is that it requires competence that the USA does not seem to have.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
That's part of it. I do think Singapore itself *might* be able to contain it if they keep borders closed for 18 months. But the fact that they failed the first time speaks volumes of what's going to happen elsewhere. If I thought it could be contained, I like your plan.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orrdavid
But they didn’t contain. They just contact traced. You need to do the testing thing that China was doing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
My impression is they thought they had it contained, but then had outbreaks they couldn't account for. Constant mass testing might work, too, if it can be organized. That's still a hope. But what Sweden is doing seems to be working well, with very few new ICU cases/day.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @orrdavid
What’s the best article on Sweden? Taiwan seems to have contained it.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
Also, fewer people are dying in the USA than usual because of lockdown not more. And no one is starving. Lockdown sucks but it’s not killing anybody.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I think the lock down kills a lot of people via suicide and slows progress. Plus human costs. For example, millions of kids can't play sports. You'll be right if a 6 week shutdown does the trick. I'll be right if it requires many shut downs. The first try is okay.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Afaik, there is only evidence of deaths falling. Fewer ods and car accidents for example. Suicide seems hard to pull off when you’re with family all the time. Generally, I’m not too worried about them anyways as they literally want to die. About kids, I bet most are actually
-
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
Are getting more exercise. In my neighborhood, every day Of the week and during school hours I just see kids happily biking around, unthreatened by the usual car traffic. Seems pretty good for them.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.