Let’s say you have a small n of randomly sampled testing from a population with x% positive and a larger N of non random testing of people who come into hospitals with a larger X% positive. Can you combine both samples to inform your estimate of the true population prevalence?
Yes, but with the following qualifiers: 1. If n is sufficiently big, you don't need N. A surprisingly small n is enough to give you a sense of prevalence amongst a population within a certain confidence level. This is the basic premise behind sampling in quality control.
-
-
2. N is relevant insofar as you know what % of infected go to the hospital (in real life that % is dynamic, but anyways...). So you could say, between 10% and 50% of infections go to the hospital. If you have 100 patients, then you know there are 200 to 1000 infections.
-
What I’m wondering is if under different testing regimes we can make different inferences of how much ex ante we should expect X>x (ie, do we think someone who gets tested is one hundred or twice as likely to be positive as the general pop?)
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.