I acknowledge that our country's response has been, not only TRASH, but worse than China's.
-
-
-
Replying to @KaiserKuo
Go look at my tweets buddy. I contribute a ton when I'm not crushing you at twitter debate


1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @KaiserKuo
Based on wide range of epidemic stats from SK/Germany to Italy/Spain...China’s numbers fit squarely within range of other countries...if it’s “bullshit” they’re coincidentally in the ballpark, and since they got the virus first they can’t retroactively fit their numbers either.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gonglei89 @KaiserKuo
That is completely wrong. Pop SK = 51 million, they have 10k cases. Pop Italy = 61 million, they have 100k China equivalent would be roughly 300k and 2.5 million respectively. The most recent case data is also hilariously false. 0 cases excluding "imported" - give me a break.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
If you take the 10 countries on this graph that are not China total cases are about 530k. Their populations are together less than China's by a lot.pic.twitter.com/sp3pv4twA3
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @KaiserKuo
Counts not the same thing as ratios...any epidemiologist would tell you that unless you do population wide testing no one is going to have accurate counts. That doesn’t mean the numbers are “BS”.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gonglei89 @KaiserKuo
I'm giving you ratios and counts. Thats why I gave you pops. 闭嘴,你不对
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @KaiserKuo
No one’s counts are accurate for actual number of cases because no one’s done population wide epidemic survey yet. That’s why we look at ratios, because they give us idea of whether sampling is biasing up or down. If you’re deliberately fudging numbers makes no sense to bias up.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gonglei89 @KaiserKuo
Actually, Iceland has come very close. They have tested more than any other country on a per capita basis (~3.5% of population). They have 1086 cases and a population of 375,000, which would put a China equivalent number at a little more than 4 million. 3.5% is enough.pic.twitter.com/DnzNgEQZLD
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Of course, since China's had a raging infection longer than Iceland, their numbers could be higher than that! So...yeah, you're not right.
-
-
Oh man,be open mind like you said there is no need to hide number on purpose at all. why would China do that , it does’n make sense in my context but differ with yours. Think throughly you will get the numbers should analyze locally since different measures taken by countries
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.