My prediction: The epidemic hits in a month or two and there are massive casualties but nowhere near enough to give herd immunity if things stop being shut down. Everything stays locked down until a year from now when there's a vaccine which works reliably \
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @bramcohen
I've read that no chance that we get a vaccine in a year
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
I'm being a bit optimistic on that part, but a lot of resources are being thrown at it and it is a universally recognized emergency situation.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @bramcohen
The Joe Rogan/Osterholm interview goes into it. Basically, we could have a vaccine tomorrow, but it takes a lot of time to know whether or not it works and is safe. Some vaccines seem to work...and then they kill you. It's not just a question of expediting regulatory processes.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @bramcohen
Once a vaccine is shown to be safe and has construct validity, they'll probably just deploy it en masse anyway and hope it's effective. Waiting for a preventative clinical trial at the cost of the economy is dumb.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RichArschmann @bramcohen
Can't. It could kill people and they could be infectious. This don't work.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @bramcohen
Phase 1 tests safety and 2 and 3 efficacy. I am proposing that we conduct phase I clinical trials and then deploy it en masse instead of small 2s and 3s.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
My mistake. Missed what you wrote. Agree with your phase 2 and 3 plans. Just must make damned sure it is safe and not infectious before moving to next step which takes much time.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.