Probably stupid to tweet this, and I do so with suitable humility knowing full well I could be totally wrong (no one really knows), but this really does feel like the bottom (for markets; not the economy/corona spread). 1/n
-
Show this thread
-
When prices fall exponentially faster and faster, it is akin to an 'anti-bubble' - the inverse of climactic tops during bubbles, for much the same reasons in reverse. It is very characteristic of market lows.
3 replies 1 retweet 9 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @LT3000Lyall
I don't understand this. The principal reason bubbles occur is that people expect prices to continue to rise so they buy, driving up prices, expecting that to occur. This can happen in reverse and a big move could merely reinforce that behavior. Can you clarify?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
People expect/fear prices to keep falling so they sell faster and faster.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LT3000Lyall
Sure, but that doesn't mean the low is near. Most people and a lot of money don't understand and/or ignores fundamentals. You can drop 10% and quite easily drop another 10% the next day. If anything, it's mathematically easier to do that as tomorrow's 10% < today's.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Technically speaking, usually it does mean the lows are near. Has certainly been the case historically, and exponentially rapid price falls are often a sign of peak/climactic selling of a pace that will be increasingly hard to sustain.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Sort of true for GFC. Took another 5 months to bottom. Doesn't look true for the Nasdaq during the internet bubble of '00. There's some relationship here with Mandelbrot's work on long memory of volatility periods in the market, but I can't remember how exactly that went.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.