(1/2) It isn't ambiguous who the better poker player is. Win rate over a year is statistically significant. Despite having a black and white measuring stick, bad professionals were still very confident in their views and would regularly challenge the ideas of better players.
Is a year enough time for a professional? I’ve see guys go through long bad swings.
-
-
For live poker you need a couple years. For tournaments maybe 3. There's a nice variance simulator for the confidence interval based on number of hands and standard deviation:https://www.primedope.com/poker-variance-calculator/ …
-
1 year is enough for online assuming enough hands are played? 5 years for stocks haha?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
A top winner might have had 10bb/100 win rate with 130 standard deviation, and played 60k hands a month.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.