Because... <insert reason here>
-
-
Replying to @DeltaV_ @BadEconTakes
"Productivity-adjusted wages" is not a thing
1 reply 0 retweets 17 likes -
Replying to @Noahpinion @BadEconTakes
Because productivity and wages have nothing to do with each other. I think you just made Sanders' point.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @DeltaV_1 reply 0 retweets 18 likes
-
Replying to @Noahpinion @BadEconTakes
I can learn. Educate me. Why are productivity and wages disconnected?pic.twitter.com/o6iuFrEfRs
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
you're the one who came up with "adjusting wages by productivity." This isn't a thing. The onus is on you to explain it.
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @red_boxer0 @DeltaV_ and
I can explain it. If output of work per dollar rises but real median wage of non-supervisory and production employee falls, we can say that productivity gains are being captured mostly by managers and owners rather than workers, which is sanders’ point.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @red_boxer0 and
But real median wages didn't fall...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart @red_boxer0 and
The chart is in the original tweet. Didn't you see it?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I was talking about non supervisory workers
-
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart @Alex__Pitti and
70% of the workforce. I believe that the average wage for 70% of the workforce is a reasonable proxy for median wages...
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.