What’s there to study though? Like...the yields are good. You just pick a number out of the air and say that’s the percent chance they screw foreign shareholders. Run the math and you’re done.
-
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Study how legit this is. It's been business as normal for a long time. I've heard Russia is uninvestable a couple times. But just because everyone says something doesn't make it so. I have to figure out the incentives of Putin, essentially?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @orrdavid
You live in Thailand. All countries like that periodically fuck the foreigners. In a given year there’s a 5-10 chance if that happening. Can he do that with an oil company or pipeline? Sure. He can also turn off oil to Europe whenever he gets in a fight 10% yield, 5-10% chance
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Thailand has % caps on how much stock foreigners can own. But they've never stolen the equity. I've thought of buying a couple companies, but I can't do it with my US broker account so it's not worth the effort. I understand the incentives in Thailand and would invest here.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @orrdavid @Molson_Hart
Same for where I live (Colombia) (and I have invested here). Overly simplistic thinking that all EMs want to screw foreigners and - sadly - is part of why countries with better governance aren't adequately rewarded.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @irbezek @Molson_Hart
Templeton did very well investing worldwide. And looking at these valuations I can see why.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @orrdavid @Molson_Hart
Colombia's leading bank was selling for less than 7x earnings at the bottom in 2016. GDP still growing at 2%. No significant bad loans. Continuous dividend hikes back to 2002. If you make it through 2008 healthy, was 2016 really going to blow you up?
$CIB1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Yet many people I talked to about it wouldn't even look at it due to country risk - despite its economy scoring ahead of much of the EU on economic freedom. And why would the government loot a bank that is tied to the country's elite?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Im just saying there are risks. How much of their deposits are drug money? Maybe the us gets a stick up it’s ass about that and hits them with a fine. FARC is fucked but could it come back...etc etc
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @orrdavid
That's fair - and actually even more so in that they have significant market share in Panama as well so the Panama Papers/offshore stuff could have been problematic.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I think it’s wrong to not look, but yeah. They are on average cheaper for good reasons
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.