I am of the belief that pitch competitions and startup battles are bad for entrepreneurship. Starting a company is not about winning a pitch competition it’s about building a meaningful business that adds value to your customers.
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @iamamoslee
What bout the “hot takes” from the judges (most of whom have never invested nor started anything) who just spent 2 minutes listening to your pitch and now get 30 seconds to give you a nuanced question or feedback in front of a live audience?! That’s gotta help, right? :-)
4 replies 1 retweet 23 likes -
Replying to @mgirdley @iamamoslee
With two profitable vibrant growing companies, I am 0 for 6 in pitch competitions. The best company rarely wins. The judges are usually trash. I’d even argue that winning one of those, like early press coverage (particularly personally focused), is a strong COUNTER signal.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @iamamoslee
IMHO: Pitch competitions are in a category of things that look like progress but aren't.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @mgirdley @iamamoslee
What is it good for? They’re lots of work, they’re time consuming, and if you need money or advice it’s better to just directly contact people for that.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @iamamoslee
There is some upside: 1) Awareness (just by competing) 2) Practice (forces you to explain your business well) 3) Fun (if you're into competing) 4) Inspiring (can be a morale builder) 5) Validation (some customers/investors put stake in them) All worse than customer traction.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.