6. We're going to be hearing about the coronavirus for a long time. It takes time for one person to infect others and then once infections in an area or country reach critical mass the area will be shut down which will slow transmission, but likely not enough to contain it.
-
Show this thread
-
7. In a weird way, I could see chickenpox-like parties for kids. People are going to go crazy over the next year as this plays out. People may just try to get it because they're so sick of being stuck inside.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
8. No one wants to see people die, so if you're government and I'm right that the virus at this point can't be contained, it's all about delaying it until a vaccine can be developed and then reach big production.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
9. Coronavirus will massively shift people towards working at home. All but essential services and package delivery will switch to work at home. This may create resentment amongst those who are forced to take risks for those get to stay at home. It aligns with class-conflict.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likesShow this thread -
10. Okay I'm spent. My main takeaway is, notwithstanding the specter of death of ourselves and relatives, we are going to get sooooo sick of hearing about this soon. It's a unique time in history. We have a pandemic, but we can slow it down because of communications technology.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Let's look at how I could be wrong: A. Fast vaccine creation (doubt it) B. A cocktail of current drugs work C. Asian people are materially more susceptible (the bioweapon to make China's population younger thesis)
3 replies 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
D. I'm extrapolating from super spreaders. The British guy open-mouth coughed everywhere and hugged everyone. Seems unlikely based on Singapore tracing E. China has no idea how to treat people. Well, if that's true, how are Indonesia and India going to handle this?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
What about the idea that if we can get past flu season in the next couple of months it just dies out?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Kane_1200
You mean it's killed by hot temperatures? Feels unlikely given the rate of transmission in Singapore.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Will Kane Retweeted
I’ve had that thought too. This was an interesting thread: https://twitter.com/saxena_puru/status/1227065623139606533?s=21 … https://twitter.com/saxena_puru/status/1227065623139606533 …
Will Kane added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Molson Hart Retweeted Puru Saxena
That would be a 1% mortality rate, which, if 50% of the US gets it, would be 1.5 million people. Flu mortality is .01%, so 100x worse than the flu.https://twitter.com/saxena_puru/status/1227067184154738688 …
Molson Hart added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.