Venture debt is like a delicious sandwich that only costs ten cents, but occasionally explodes in your face. If I were running a startup, I don't think I'd ever take it.
-
-
Replying to @paulg
What?! I know there is an inherent bias coming from one of the largest early stage VC firms. I think there is a place and a time absolutely. I guess you could say growth at all costs, and I could say avoid dilution at all costs.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tobyns
Why would I be biased? Venture debt doesn't compete with seed funding.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Because you’d rather follow on investments dilute yours than destroy them. I’d argue that vc’s desire for multiple founders is a similar calculation. Debt, unlike equity, can cause catastrophe, but to say there’s no place for it in startups is a head scratcher.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @tobyns
The portfolio effect should make me *want* founders to make risky moves like taking venture debt.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
I disagree and you do too. Debt adds great risk without great upside. Follow on equity investments de-risk while maintain or increase upside. Suppose you're investing in Facebook and you see it's going really well and Zuckerberg says he wants to take on some debt.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @tobyns
No rational founder would incur the additional risk of taking debt without corresponding upside potential.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
I think that’s *the* point: the upside of taking debt is mostly the founder’s, because she gets to keep her equity. She only gets more and more diluted with addtl equity rounds, whereas other investors usually do their pro-ratas.
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
The investors get diluted exactly as much. Investors have to pay for pro-ratas. Logically they're equivalent to separate investments — which they are for new investors in that round.
4 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
What percent of the time do your founders participate in pro-ratas? You fund a lot of Rockefellers? Correct me if wrong, but oftentimes the funding documents allow the investors certain rights to participate in follow on rounds that founders don't have.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.