Venture debt is like a delicious sandwich that only costs ten cents, but occasionally explodes in your face. If I were running a startup, I don't think I'd ever take it.
-
-
Replying to @paulg
What?! I know there is an inherent bias coming from one of the largest early stage VC firms. I think there is a place and a time absolutely. I guess you could say growth at all costs, and I could say avoid dilution at all costs.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @tobyns
Why would I be biased? Venture debt doesn't compete with seed funding.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Because you’d rather follow on investments dilute yours than destroy them. I’d argue that vc’s desire for multiple founders is a similar calculation. Debt, unlike equity, can cause catastrophe, but to say there’s no place for it in startups is a head scratcher.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @tobyns
The portfolio effect should make me *want* founders to make risky moves like taking venture debt.
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
I disagree and you do too. Debt adds great risk without great upside. Follow on equity investments de-risk while maintain or increase upside. Suppose you're investing in Facebook and you see it's going really well and Zuckerberg says he wants to take on some debt.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @tobyns
No rational founder would incur the additional risk of taking debt without corresponding upside potential.
3 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
If a founder is capable of rationally making that decision, he/she doesn't need your advice on the topic then.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.