Saying today that we shouldn't be worried about the coronavirus outbreak because the flu kills many more people every year is like saying on 9/11/2001 after one plane hit that we shouldn't be worried about terrorism because more people die from airplane mechanical failure.
-
-
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Extending the simile to the Patriot Act and (at a minimum) Iraq War also shows that a big problem doesn’t mean every solution is the right one
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidgshort
Clever counterpoint! However, the Patriot Act and Iraq War equivalent for the coronavirus would be permanent government access to all US citizens' medical records and bombing Mongolia because it's next door to China.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart @davidgshort
Also, of course, being worried or concerned about a pandemic is a far cry from actions the United States foolishly took in the wake up 9/11.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Yes, absolutely. There are definitely positive actions the government can take, and public health crises are one of the most important areas for them to act, but we do often let our guard down on government intrusion when panicking
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidgshort
Sure, but you’re not arguing that we shouldn’t panic because it may result in extreme government action right? It’s possible to be concerned about the virus while at the same time remain vigilant against government oversteps.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Molson_Hart
Just to clarify as I reread your question: no, I’m not arguing against panic. I’m simply arguing against over reaction or ineffective reaction, and to always be thoughtful about potential externalities and unintended negative consequences of large scale government action
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.