Let’s talk the optimal number of cofounders. First, note that team is the greatest determinant of success, not idea or market, as it is the least changeable. Let’s start with 4+: As PG says, this is a strong signal that you have no idea what you’re doing.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1213833006789615616 …
-
-
Typically do not cost investors much equity, while at the same time greatly increase chance of success. A bad cofounder rarely dooms a Zuckerberg. These type of guys just steamroll through the oroblems, no matter what. So in summary, if you’ve got the goods and you’re sure of it
Show this thread -
, meaning you can do everything necessary to make it work: code, sell, hire, adapt, pick yourself up when you’re down, don’t get a cofounder. Just do it yourself. All partnerships in business are temporary. One partner is always more motivated, better, etc. Spare yourself the
Show this thread -
Headache of duplicate communication. Just do it yourself.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cynically, it is probably a wedge the VCs can use to claw more out. Divide and conquer, few partnerships will be solid enough that one doesn't eventually defect.
-
When does a VC want to drive a wedge between them? These days, money is not in short supply, VCs can buy out the crappy cofounders, but they don’t know who’s good at the beginning.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.