Let’s talk the optimal number of cofounders. First, note that team is the greatest determinant of success, not idea or market, as it is the least changeable. Let’s start with 4+: As PG says, this is a strong signal that you have no idea what you’re doing.https://twitter.com/paulg/status/1213833006789615616 …
-
-
So, if this is the case why are solo founders not blessed by Y Combinator? The stated reason is psychology. It’s emotionally draining to start a company and having a first mate makes the lows less low and maybe even makes the highs less high (a good thing too).
Show this thread -
There’s another reason that is much less talked about. Again, as I said, team is most important determinant of success. A team consisting of one Zuckerberg and 2 non-Zuckerbergs will make it. A team of 1, 2, or 3 Zucks won’t. The point is it’s an investor hedge. Add’l cofounders
Show this thread -
Typically do not cost investors much equity, while at the same time greatly increase chance of success. A bad cofounder rarely dooms a Zuckerberg. These type of guys just steamroll through the oroblems, no matter what. So in summary, if you’ve got the goods and you’re sure of it
Show this thread -
, meaning you can do everything necessary to make it work: code, sell, hire, adapt, pick yourself up when you’re down, don’t get a cofounder. Just do it yourself. All partnerships in business are temporary. One partner is always more motivated, better, etc. Spare yourself the
Show this thread -
Headache of duplicate communication. Just do it yourself.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.