Hypothetically, would it be better to triple the number of humans to have the resources to build sustainable technology to save the planet, or would it be better to cap/limit the number humans in order to slow the damage we are doing? Discuss
Which I agreed to already in this tweet.https://twitter.com/Molson_Hart/status/1212913549145726981 …
-
-
Let me know if I don’t understand your argument correctly: 3x people, and thus 3x the number of people who are in Elon’s standard deviation from the mean IQ, will solve this problem better than the original number of people, just with a higher percent having increased focus?
-
If you need a 130 IQ and motivation to be Elon and anyone can flip a motivation switch, but cannot flip an IQ switch, then increasing the number of people on the earth, increasing # of potential Elon's. I'm done.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.