Space science is as valid as economics, in my opinion. No doubt there is data to collect, measure, etc. but the conclusions often stray far from true science (and everyday observation or common sense) into the realm of dogmatic religion.
Pretty fascinating: 1. Why Pluto's not a planet 2. Why Jupiter also is not a planet 3. Why we can use the wobbling of a far away star as evidence of large planetshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Vp4kx-jX9Q&fbclid=IwAR2S_UCxiMXQhsdtzTjHc1Bv8DBKuUdwvfw38o3PAdn1ol22GiTUfZI_zaQ …
-
-
-
What I was posting is fairly predictable. It’s not string theory and stuff like that, which, yes, is about as predictable as dynamic multi human games (aka economics).
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.